Programmes

Four Pillars, One Body of Work.

CORE organises clinical practice, partnership, evidence and training into a single operating model, and every current programme sits within it.

How the Work Is Organised

  1. Clinical

    Clinical

    Direct clinical practice expanding access to minimally invasive, image-guided interventions, while supporting durable clinical services, workflows and referral pathways.

  2. Outreach

    Outreach

    Building bridges between patients, clinicians, hospitals, professional societies, communities, industry, diaspora physicians and international partners; identifying unmet needs, developing collaborations, raising awareness and connecting resources with locally defined priorities.

  3. Research

    Research

    Generating and supporting locally relevant research around disease burden, outcomes, barriers to care, appropriate solutions and evidence for policy, investment and clinical practice.

  4. Education

    Education

    Developing sustainable expertise through specialist training, mentorship, observerships, courses, multidisciplinary education and knowledge exchange.

Current Programmes

Programmes That Build Capacity.

Each programme is managed as a first-class record: applications, review, decisions and reporting all run through the same infrastructure.

Education

Education Grants and Stipends

Support for medical students and radiology residents seeking meaningful exposure to interventional radiology.

Clinical

Direct Clinical Care

Direct interventional radiology care at multiple institutions in Nigeria.

Education + Outreach

IR Training Programs and Initiatives

Teaching, mentorship, institutional partnerships and skills development.

Research

Research and Innovation Grants

Device innovation, health-systems research and public-health research focused on IR in West Africa.

Find Your Pathway

Which Route Fits You?

Three steps: tell us who you are, where your service or training currently stands, and see the programmes and preparation that apply.

  1. 1Who You Are
  2. 2Where You Stand
  3. 3Your Pathway

Step 01 · Who You Are

Why Image-Guided Care

Compare the Two Approaches.

CHOOSE A CLINICAL SITUATION Choose a clinical situation, then compare conventional open surgery with the image-guided alternative across incision, anaesthesia, hospital stay and physiological burden.

Symptomatic uterine fibroids causing heavy bleeding, pain or pressure.

Compare Approach

Conventional Open Surgery

Open Abdominal Myomectomy or Hysterectomy

Minimally Invasive, Image-Guided

Uterine Fibroid Embolisation

Currently Shown

  • Incision and Access

    Open Surgery

    Abdominal incision, typically 10–20 cm, with layered closure and a visible scar.

    Image-Guided Treatment

    Pinhole puncture at the wrist or groin, a few millimetres wide, closed without stitches.

  • Anaesthesia

    Open Surgery

    General anaesthesia with airway management and an anaesthetic team for the full procedure.

    Image-Guided Treatment

    Local anaesthesia at the puncture site with conscious sedation and pain control.

  • Hospital Stay and Recovery

    Open Surgery

    Several days as an inpatient, with weeks before a return to usual activity.

    Image-Guided Treatment

    Same-day or overnight observation in most cases, with a shorter return to usual activity.

  • Physiological Burden

    Open Surgery

    Greater blood loss, more wound-related risk and a larger surgical stress response.

    Image-Guided Treatment

    Targeted treatment through the blood vessels, with the uterus preserved and less blood loss.

Both approaches are legitimate clinical options. Suitability depends on the patient, the imaging findings and the clinical team. This comparison is general clinical information, not medical advice, and not a record of AIR Alliance activity.

Sponsor a Programme

Support a Training Place or a Clinical Programme.

Giving goes towards the education, clinical support, partnerships and research described on this page.

Support the Alliance